top of page
LexGyaan


POSH Wake-Up Call: IC “Recommendations” Are Not Optional
The recent decision of the Allahabad High Court in the case of Sunita Devi v. State of U.P. & Ors. provides clarity on a question that has long remained ambiguously interpreted in practice — whether findings of an Internal Committee (“IC”) under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 (“POSH Act”) are merely recommendatory or binding in nature. It has been held that once the IC concludes that sexual harassment has occurr
Tara Sehgal
May 61 min read


Beyond Organisational Boundaries: Supreme Court On Functional Scope of IC's Under The Posh Act
The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 (“ POSH Act ”) was enacted to safeguard a woman’s fundamental right to work with dignity. While most organisations today are aware of the law, practical challenges often arise not from lack of intent to comply, but from misunderstandings around how the POSH Act operates in real and complex workplace situations. One recurring issue revolves around whether an Internal Committee (“
Tara Sehgal
Jan 303 min read
bottom of page
